Search for: "Analysis Group Incorporated v. O" Results 201 - 220 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
  This body of law, however, is less well codified with respect to our current, novel type of armed conflict against armed groups such as al-Qaida and the Taliban. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:33 am by Lawrence Solum
  Nor is it a question that demands for its solution any analysis of political considerations or social ideals. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am by Ray Dowd
The doctrine only existed in the U.S. as common law until it was incorporated into the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma (Docket Report) District Court M D Georgia: Timing of invalidity opinion key to wilfulness analysis: Great Dane Limited Partnership v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
DirecTV Group, Inc., 523 F.3d 1323, 1332 (Fed. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:48 am by Lawrence Solum
The most striking example is provided by the balancing test announced in Mathews v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:36 am by gmlevine
” In a more recent SPECS proceeding against a different Respondent, SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://thinkipstrategy.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: Consolidated ACTA text is released – news and analysis (KEI) (Michael Geist) (IPKat) (Public Knowledge) (Public Knowledge) (EFF) (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) (Ars Technica) Innovationpartners) (IP Watch) (KEI) (Innovationpartners) Copyright Bill introduced in Rajya Sabha (Spicy IP) (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) US… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  There is valuable substantive analysis to be done. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:24 am by Lawrence Solum
  Nor is it a question that demands for its solution any analysis of political considerations or social ideals. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
Even industry groups and manufacturing executives have acknowledged and reluctantly conceded that litigation has enhanced product safety by changing the way they do business. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:51 am by Matt C. Bailey
The trial court’s “[o]verarching[]” concern was that there was no evidence that any particular NSAID would be a proper comparator for each class member.See Slip Opinion, at 28 n.23.The Court’s analysis is very dense, and likely will take some time to fully unpack. [read post]