Search for: "Appeal of Means (franklin)" Results 201 - 220 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2011, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
Franklin… You want me to wear that? [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:26 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Eve to hand the burly, silvery-haired Black the same 6 1/2-year sentence she originally meted out in 2007, meaning he would have to spend about 4 1/2 more years in prison. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:26 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Eve to hand the burly, silvery-haired Black the same 6 1/2-year sentence she originally meted out in 2007, meaning he would have to spend about 4 1/2 more years in prison. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 8:58 pm
Franklin Fitch on how, in light of Shepard v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Franklin & Hyman: different answers depending on what stimulus—what they imagined, what they expected, what they saw. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
A three-judge panel for the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously with the Biden administration and the Ways and Means Committee, ruling against Trump’s arguments against the committee’s authority, his privacy concerns, and his claim that complying with the request would be unconstitutional. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 4:54 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
President Franklin Roosevelt pointed out at the time that these were the workers most in need of the Act’s help. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 2:06 pm by Eva Arevuo
Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Jeffrey Sutton, an appointee of George W. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 8:55 am by Mark Ashton
We need to explore more efficient means of getting to a result in an age when income is less regular and more spasmodic. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:29 pm by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
*******FRANKLIN WOODSDirect Appeal Publishedhttp://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/10a0116p-06.pdfDefendant appealed his sentence of 108 months for manufacturing methamphetamine. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Paramount Pictures Corp, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, held that “television viewing” and “videocassette viewing” were not “coextensive” terms.8  And, that a license which included the right to exhibit a film on TV did not include the right to distribute the film on home video. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Paramount Pictures Corp, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, held that “television viewing” and “videocassette viewing” were not “coextensive” terms.8  And, that a license which included the right to exhibit a film on TV did not include the right to distribute the film on home video. [read post]