Search for: "Apple v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 4,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2022, 2:37 pm by Florian Mueller
Apple asked the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas to interfere, but Judge Rodney Gilstrap declined the invitation. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:41 pm by Florian Mueller
"Three weeks ago, Apple and Samsung agreed to withdraw all litigation pending between them outside the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:22 am
Ready Pac Foods Inc. is recalling apples shipped to 36 U.S. states for restaurants and grocery stores because of potential contamination from the bacterium Listeria. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 5:07 pm by Swaraj Paul Barooah
The decision does not come as a big surprise, given the general trend followed by courts in the US post the epoch making decision in eBay v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:14 pm by Florian Mueller
Late on Tuesday, Apple and Samsung filed a joint stipulation with the United States District Court for the Northern District of California concerning the addition of new products, or new product versions, to the second case pending between these parties in that district. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:35 am by Florian Mueller
But a tipping point may have been reached at which conservation will come to an end even in her district court.A few days ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Samsung's motion to stay issuance of a mandate (pending a Supreme Court petition) following a recent appellate ruling on the first California Apple v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:30 am by Florian Mueller
" The case no. is 21 O 13504/20, and the court scheduled a hearing for May 12.VoiceAge EVS is also enforcing patents in the United States, such as against Xiaomi. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 5:23 am by Florian Mueller
Judge Koh, however, had allowed a renewed motion for a stay only in a situation in which Apple's only option left would be a notice of appeal.Samsung's notice of Apple's appeal says that "Apple did not take any of the actions Apple described other than filing a Notice of Appeal, because it could not have meaningfully taken such actions, precisely as Samsung stated". [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:53 pm by Florian Mueller
It's about nothing less than the ability of Apple and other patent holders to win permanent injunctions in the United States against direct competitors infringing some of their patents. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm by Florian Mueller
A few hours after I wrote that this Friday (October 9) and Monday (October 12) were the days on which the United States District Court for the Northern District of California was particularly likely to rule on Epic Games' motion for a preliminary injunction (PI)against Apple, and consistent with what I had told a major newspaper after Epic's temporary restraining order (TRO; blog post), Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers has effectively converted the TRO into a PI (this post… [read post]