Search for: "Application of Cochran"
Results 201 - 220
of 242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
The split decision means Cochran's rationale cannot serve as precedent in future rulings about the pre-1991 jury instruction. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:09 am
Hood challenged the instruction initially on his first writ, but then deleted it from his amended application. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:16 am
From Judge Cochran's majority opinion:This is all very awkward. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:35 pm
Cochran, 377 F.3d 522, 525 (6th Cir. 2004) (same); Barnhart v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:52 am
Co. v Cochrane, 64 NY2d 796 [1985]). [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
Click here to read Judianne Cochran's last article posted on the Ohio Family Law Blog about Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS). [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 10:10 pm
Indeed, harming children brings up images of the proper application of the Iron Maiden in the back of my mind. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 11:41 am
The dissent sure makes sense — kudos to Justices Cochran, Price, and Holcomb. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:54 pm
"); Cochrane v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
" Cochrane v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:17 pm
See, e.g., Cochran v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:01 am
Applications are welcome from untenured faculty and recently tenured faculty and from those who will be joining a faculty in the upcoming academic year. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:23 am
Among the cases on the hand-down list from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals today is an opinion in the case of Mark de la Paz vs. the State of Texas - litigation growing out of the infamous Dallas "fake drug" case where an informant helped crooked Dallas narcotics officers set up 24 people The opinion, written by Judge Cathy Cochran, opens:Appellant, a former Dallas Police Department Narcotics detective, was convicted of (1) tampering with physical evidence for knowingly making… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 8:30 am
We're seeing a lot of license applications for new reactors. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
The state of the art defense cases thus provide a well-established body of law, and a reasonably numerous collection of factual analogies for dealing with the knotty question of whether there was insufficient "new" information for the FDA to allow a CBE submission, and thus for the application of preemption.Here are the state-of-the-art cases that we're familiar with in our limited field of drug and medical device product liability litigation:Alaska: Shanks v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:22 am
Judges on the Court of Criminal Appeals believe they can tell: "Applicant is clearly 'crazy,' but he is also 'sane' under Texas law," wrote Judge Cochran. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 10:40 pm
Diehr, 450 U.S. 175, 192 (1981); Parker, 437 U.S. at 589 n.9; Cochrane v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Sep. 24, 2007) (plaintiff did not serve within 120 days, Magistrate recommended additional 90 days, and Judge granted additional 270 days as "reasonable"); Cochran v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
[See the Board's February 2008 decision (TTABlogged here), sustaining Nextel's opposition to Motorola's application to register a 911 Hz chirp on the ground that it failed to function as a trademark.]January 14, 2009 - 10 AM: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
Judge Price, joined by Judges Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, and Cochran, held that it doesn't and dismissed the application for want of jurisdiction. [read post]
