Search for: "Application of Peter Andrews (3 Cases)" Results 201 - 220 of 291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm by admin
EPA, case no. 17-cv-02162-EMC (N.D. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 10:59 am by Wenqing Zhao, David Stanton
In Guangzhou, the video detection system is said to have “identified more than 2000 suspects … captured more than 800 people and successfully solved nearly 100 cases” in the last year alone. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by INFORRM
On 10 March 2023 there was a contempt application in the case of Miller -v- Peake QB-2022-001106. [read post]
As mentioned in the beginning of this article, this is the first case in which a judge determined the annotation of the claim interpretation of a patent—and based on a statutory provision the applicability of which is questionable at best. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:16 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
(3)      In relation to the second question, what circumstances must be taken into account in assessing the existence of liability? [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm by Adam Feldman
Although several other big-firm attorneys top this list, the list also includes a handful of attorneys from smaller appellate boutiques, including Peter Stris and Daniel Geyser from the Los Angeles based firm Stris & Maher (Geyser has since started his own boutique, Geyser PC) and Thomas Goldstein, from the D.C. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
Next, we examine the applicable law that governs the matters at issue. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Three programs have been announced: (1) Constitutional with Peter Hogg, Brian Greenspan, and Andrew Lokan – March 22, 2016; (2) Torts with Bruce Feldthusen and Roger Oatley – April 7th, 2016: and (3) Criminal with Kent Roach, Brian Greenspan and Kim Crosbie – May 10th, 2016. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am by Patricia Hughes
The reason, the motivations, for the disruption of the parliamentary sitting in each case. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
Yes - http://tinyurl.com/4gmagua (James Morton) Case Summary: Nissan N. [read post]
20 May 2023, 6:29 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Of further note are the provisions of Article 4 (3) of the Code of Conduct (emphasis added): 3. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:34 am by Alicia Maule
Reed is represented by Innocent Project Senior Staff Attorney Bryce Benjet and Andrew MacRae of Levatino Pace PLLC. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am by Frank Cranmer
Perhaps the No 10 Press Office should read s1(3) Banking and Financial Dealings Act 1971? [read post]
One remarkable case illustrating this balance is how the courts ruled on applications for preliminary injunctions during the enforcement campaign filed by Genentech, seeking to protect the innovation aspects of a biological product. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 11 May 2022, judgment was handed down in the case of (1) Kumlin (2) EEW Eco Energy World plc v (1) Jonsson (2) Agerman (3) Östlund (4) Realtid Media AB [2022] EWHC 1095 (QB). [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
On 15 January 2016 Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of McGrath v Bedford. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Steyn J heard an application in the case of Ince Group v Persons Unknown On 27 April 2022 Nicklin J heard a mode of trial application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down judgment in the case of Goodwin v News Group Newspapers (No.3) ([2011] EWHC 1437 (QB)), refusing an application to permit the identification of the interested party – but allowing the identification of her job description. [read post]