Search for: "Application of Silverman" Results 201 - 220 of 228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/oozxOd (Justin Brookman) Certify or Not to Certify…Here is ONE Answer – http://bit.ly/nTFLbF (Trent Livingston) Civil Advisory Rules Committee to Consider Preservation Rule in November – http://bit.ly/o89BOD (Robert Owen) Cloud Computing Case Clarifies Applicability of U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 12:10 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
  A little background will help to understand that statutory subsection and its application to the creation of Form 22C. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark As discussed in the following guest post from John Reed Stark, a recent development in the class action litigation arising out of the massive Marriott International data breach could have significant ramifications for other claimants asserting class action claims — including securities class action claims — based on data breaches or other cybersecurity incidents. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 2:06 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
  The Court held: Unless it is filed under a “safe harbor” provision similar to § 6020(a), a state income tax return that is filed late under the applicable nonbankruptcy state law is not a “return” for bankruptcy discharge purposes under § 523(a). [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
     September 16, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Defendants sustained physical abuse of the plaintiff constituted egregious marital fault to be factored into equitable distribution award  In Socci v Socci, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2020 WL 5223043 (Mem), 2020 N.Y. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The hearing of the applications in Levy v Coomber before HHJ Moloney QC concluded on 16 November 2011, with judgment being reserved. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 24 January 2012, HHJ Parkes QC heard an application in the case of Singh v Singh. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Court observed that a different test might be applicable in circumstances where, for instance, a partner did not have any preconception agreement with the legal parent. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The Court observed that a different test might be applicable in circumstances where, for instance, a partner did not have any preconception agreement with the legal parent. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
To date, responses of AI builders and sellers to these issues vary from ignoring them, to attempting negotiations with certain parties, to lawsuits, but to my knowledge (and to the knowledge of experts I’ve spoken with), no definitive solutions have been established, and some contend these conversations are just beginning.[5] Challenges include finding solutions to data scraping for training AI models that both fairly address the interests of rights holders and data subjects, while also… [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:08 am by Eric Goldman
The court summarizes the applicable legal standard: We agree with Southwest Recreational, the Ninth Circuit opinions, and the treatise author [McCarthy] that in the context of internet searches and search-engine advertising in particular, the critical issue is whether there is consumer confusion. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
The court summarizes the alleged trademark problems: Defendant used the phrase “Online Arrangement” and Plaintiffs’ trademark “Seeking Millionaire” as metatags on its website to direct consumers who searched for “Seeking,” “Seeking Millionaire,” and “Seeking Arrangement” to its own website and mobile application. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:19 pm by Eric Goldman
. * the questions about the applicability of descriptive fair use for a trademark so obviously descriptive, especially when the defendant used a modified variation of the term (i.e., the addition of the term “fruit”) * the court’s insufficient acknowledgement of the pro-competitive implications of keyword advertising. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
The committee has a new proposal based on the ethics rule against marketing the name of lawyers who aren’t affiliated with the firm (an anti-bait-and-switch rule normally applicable to departing attorneys). [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
At 2.00pm the same judge heard an application in the case of EWQ v GFD. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 4:01 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
On the same day Tugendhat J heard an application for permission to amend in the case of Modi v Clarke. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am by Sabrina McCubbin
Maryland are examples of the application of the third-party doctrine—the legal principle that when an individual voluntarily gives information to a third party, the privacy interest in that information is forfeit. [read post]
14 May 2012, 11:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
" "I have been a teacher at P.S. 91 for 18 years, but I have helped my students this year as a success mentor in ways I could never have fathomed," said Success Mentor and teacher Jonathan Silverman. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
As just one example, the complaint cites a November 2015 agreement between Marriott and Expedia with the following provision: No Party will knowingly use in any way, including a bid in paid search engine advertising, any other Parties [sic] intellectual property, including the trademarks that are listed in Exhibit G and are owned by or licensed to Expedia or Marriott, as applicable (whether or not registered) for use in connection with hotel services. [read post]