Search for: "Applied Signal Technology, Inc."
Results 201 - 220
of 436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
See, e.g., eBay, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 12:23 pm
Stamer works closely with employer and other plan sponsors, insurance and financial services companies, plan fiduciaries, administrators, and vendors and others to design, administer and defend effective legally defensible employee benefits and compensation practices, programs, products and technology. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
The case is not, as Geist suggests, a court chilling technological innovation. [read post]
The Canadian Copyright Board: To Be or Not To Be –That Is A Question – ALAI Conference, May 25, 2016
28 Jun 2016, 2:37 pm
This was evident in the response of Jason Kee of Google and others who spoke for powerful interests, who emphasized that new technology moves very quickly and delay and retroactivity are serious concerns, even for an enterprise as powerful as Google. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:20 am
" eBay Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502, 515 (2009). [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
While cable television companies cover the costs of the technology associated with the Assembly television signal, the setting, the operations of the Assembly, and salaries and per diems of the Assembly Members whose words and images are the substance of the Assembly television signal are all paid for by the taxpayers of the State. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Panthera Dental inc., 2015 QCCS 6555 https://t.co/ykzcuw3Ux2 -> Another case examining scope of Statute of Monopolies Apotex Inc. v Schering Corporation, 2016 ONSC 3407 https://t.co/ABAeS7Hifa -> Internet service providers, First Nations gird for fight over Quebec’s gambling law https://t.co/z4oDtznuLg -> TREB seeks ‘opt-in’ consent for MLS data to protect consumer privacy https://t.co/gyjeVz3KPR -> Four people plead guilty in theft and sale of… [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm
CACI Premier Technology, Inc. [read post]
13 May 2016, 5:38 am
Uber Technologies, Inc., No. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:32 pm
SAP America, Inc. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:07 am
OCR Charges Brought For Business Associate Agreement Violations HIPAA’s Privacy Rules generally apply to “covered entities,” which under HIPAA are health plans and insurers, health care providers, health care clearinghouses (Covered Entities) and “business associates,” which are individuals or entities that perform services that aid the Covered Entity to perform its duties as a Covered Entity. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 10:07 am
OCR Charges Brought For Business Associate Agreement Violations HIPAA’s Privacy Rules generally apply to “covered entities,” which under HIPAA are health plans and insurers, health care providers, health care clearinghouses (Covered Entities) and “business associates,” which are individuals or entities that perform services that aid the Covered Entity to perform its duties as a Covered Entity. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
Technology. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 10:37 am
On Tuesday, the latest decision from Mr Justice Arnold in American Science & Engineering Inc v Rapiscan Systems Limited [2016] EWHC 756 was handed down. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:50 pm
Investment Advice Covered By The Rule The final rule applies to “covered investment advice. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 3:50 pm
Investment Advice Covered By The Rule The final rule applies to “covered investment advice. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:38 pm
Prepare To Meet Broadened Requirements Following its publication in the March 24, Federal Register, the persuader rule is scheduled to take effect on April 25, 2016 and apply to arrangements, agreements, and payments made on or after July 1, 2016. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:38 pm
Prepare To Meet Broadened Requirements Following its publication in the March 24, Federal Register, the persuader rule is scheduled to take effect on April 25, 2016 and apply to arrangements, agreements, and payments made on or after July 1, 2016. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
He speculated that if these rules were applied in Britain, it could prohibit the publication of controversial political stories. [read post]
