Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey" Results 201 - 220 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2011, 4:11 am by Russ Bensing
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by Kali Borkoski
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and its progeny, apply to the imposition of criminal fines.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (1st Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:55 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) can't be retroactively applied under Teague. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am by MBettman
”) Apprendi New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) (“Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the statutory prescribed maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 10:51 pm by Jeff Gamso
New Jersey, any fact (except a prior conviction) that enhances a sentence beyond the statutory maximum, must be either admitted by the defendant or proved, beyond a reasonable doubt, to the satisfaction of a jury. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
New Jersey, holding that facts increasing the defendant’s statutory maximum sentence must be found by a jury. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:09 pm
NEW JERSEY, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), JONES v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm by Gabriel Chin
New Jersey, which seem to suggest that “any fact necessary” to a judgment must be presented to the jury. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Marissa Miller
New Jersey applies to the imposition of criminal fines. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:04 am by Amy Howe
New Jersey, which held that juries – rather than judges – must find, beyond a reasonable doubt, any facts that increase a sentence beyond the statutory maximum. [read post]