Search for: "Automation Systems v. Standard Automation" Results 201 - 220 of 568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
We may not be representative of different companies b/c we are small & receive a small number of requests that vary in what they ask for—readership over a period of time v. individual info. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 9:12 am by Eric Goldman
Furthermore, if curation is taking place, why does/should it matter if it’s done manually or on an automated basis?] [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Editorial Board
  Without further ado, here are our top ten most-read posts of 2023: CJEU Strips it Down for OnlyFans (C-695/20 Fenix International v HMRC) By Emilia Cole Oceans Apart: The EU and US Cybersecurity Certification Standards for Cloud Services By Kenneth Propp, Peter Swire and Josh Fox The Data Act: a (slippery) third way beyond personal/non-personal data dualism? [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Munchkin, Inc., No. 15-242 Automated Merchandising Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Munchkin, Inc., No. 15-242 Automated Merchandising Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:50 pm by Rafael Reyneri
Today, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Barr v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
Further, the court admitted the unchallenged affidavit of a records custodian of Facebook certifying that the records were from the account linked to [Glover] and stating that they had been created `at or near the time the information was transmitted by the Facebook user’ and had been kept by Facebook's `automated system. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm by Giesela Ruehl
There is no better example of this interaction than the Shape v Supreme litigation ongoing before Dutch courts, with the most recent decision in this dispute rendered in December 2019 in Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (“SHAPE”) et al v Supreme Site Service GmbH et al (Supreme), COURT OF APPEAL OF ‘s-HERTOGENBOSCH, Case No. 200/216/570/01, Ruling of 10 December 2019 (the ‘CoA Decision’). [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:11 am by Terry Hart
This may include takedowns that are a result of either overzealous or inexperienced/mistaken creators, or automated processes. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:07 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The referred questions assume that the systems and processes underlying the claimed computer-implemented simulation methods are of a technical nature. [read post]