Search for: "BROWN v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 201 - 220
of 340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2015, 7:56 am
No mutual fund can guarantee what the government is asking of Copley, he said. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am
Petitioners contend that the ordinance violates the Second Amendment as interpreted in District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
At the time of the decisions, thirteen states and the District of Columbia recognized same-sex marriage. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:07 am
Brown, J.D. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:07 am
On November 20, 2014, the District Court for the District of Columbia once again ordered Kellogg, Brown and Root (“KBR”) to produce all documents prepared as part of an internal investigation. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 6:21 am
The professor worked at the University of the District of Columbia (UDC) David A. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm
The district court granted summary judgment for the government, but the D.C. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
His right originates in an act of congress passed in February, 1801, concerning the district of Columbia. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
The United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri ruled that the Guidelines were constitutional. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:42 pm
A company’s outside counsel was acting as an attorney-agent when doing a background investigation and therefore did not qualify as a reporting agency under the FCRA, ruled a federal court in the District of Columbia (Mattiaccio v G, II v DHA Group, Inc). [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:32 am
Judge Richard Leon of the District Court for the District of Columbia granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, in a case of first impression, considered whether the U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:14 pm
On July 1, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Kellogg Brown & Root Services v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
For instance, the PPACA defines “States” as the 50 states and the District of Columbia. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:05 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted); Wolf Run Mining Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
But since both of the family cars had identical government-mandated (allegedly) inadequate warnings about not putting an infant car seat next to an airbag, who gets sued, Minigas – even though it’s car had nothing to do with the accident.Farfetched? [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
Crying foul, Ralls brought suit against CFIUS in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, which last year dismissed the suit on jurisdictional grounds. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 1:19 pm
Circuit did not directly address the work-product privilege issue in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc.5Upjohn Co. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 2:30 pm
In this environment, it was refreshing to see the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am
Additionally, genuine issues of fact existed as to whether the department’s conduct was sufficiently extreme and outrageous, so it was for the jury to resolve this issue (Amobi v District of Columbia Department of Corrections, June 27, 2014, Brown, J). [read post]
