Search for: "Baker v. U.S. District Court"
Results 201 - 220
of 772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2018, 3:07 am
Lamone, the Court considered two questions about the process of gerrymandering, or drawing political districts to benefit candidates from a political party. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:33 pm
The ruling in Baker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 1:04 pm
The District Court had found that the only patent at issue, McKesson’s U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Supreme Court, on June 15, 2015, held in Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm
In Baker, the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
Reentry courts in numbers: 56 of 94 districts have reentry courts 8 districts have multiple reentry courts 6 districts have 2 reentry courts Hon. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:55 am
Baker, June 12, 2017, Ginsberg, R.). [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
District Court ruled on June 13 that courts should review the decision-making process when the U.S. government decides to target an American citizen under the AUMF. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:51 am
Two federal courts – the Massachusetts District Court and the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
Robinson of the Delaware District Court. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
It will be interesting to see how much of the upcoming Supreme Court argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:04 pm
Hadley Baker posted the complaint in which former U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Gibbons v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
Both a federal district court and the conservative U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 10:54 am
For more than 50 years, ever since the court decided Baker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
District Court for the District of Vermont 2014). [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 10:00 am
The Supreme Court in Franklin v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 2:52 am
Baker, No. 07-219 and another one on District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 8:09 am
In today’s Washington Post, Edwin Meese has an op-ed piece in which he argues that Judge Walker’s decision ignored binding Supreme Court precedent – namely, Baker v. [read post]
