Search for: "Bell v. People" Results 201 - 220 of 1,155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eve Gaumond
According to the Digital Democracy Project, a joint initiative from the Max Bell School of Public Policy at McGill University and the Ottawa-based Public Policy Forum, “disinformation did not play a major role in the 2019 Canadian national election campaign. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Biggest takeaway: the federal judiciary has been comprehensively reshaped over the past 4 years by people who were not hired for their opinions on IP. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm by Michael Douglas
Akai Pty Ltd v People’s Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418, 429 (Dawson and McHugh JJ), 445 (Toohey, Gaudron and Gummow JJ). [8] Ibid, quoted in RCD Holdings (n 1) [57]. [9] Ibid, [58]. [10] Ibid. [11] See, eg, British Aerospace plc v Dee Howard Co [1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 368; Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corp (2004) 138 FCR 496, 506; Australian Health & Nutrition Association Ltd v Hive Marketing Group Pty Ltd (2019) 99 NSWLR 419. [12]… [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by SHG
Bell was not entirely correct As many of you know, I think that Buck v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
It did so because it was fearful people would get sick from the coronavirus. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
It did so because it was fearful people would get sick from the coronavirus. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Studios MG Ltd, a London-based software consultancy, tried to exploit the public health emergency by sending up to 9,000 unlawful marketing emails to people without their permission. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
   We explained in Red Families v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Rather than using his position of power to help people cope with the raging COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. [read post]