Search for: "Bingham v. Bingham" Results 201 - 220 of 516
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Upper Tribunal has handed down judgment in the case of Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm by Matthew Flinn
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 4:00 am by Philip Thomas
On April 11 a Jones County jury awarded $0 in damages in an admitted liability case in Livingston v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:59 am by SHG
’ Lord Bingham, DPP v Collins (here). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 26, 2012 issuance of its unanimous opinion in the Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am by INFORRM
  The Divisional Court cited Lord Bingham’s dicta in Corner House about the relative institutional competence of the courts and the executive in this field – both in practical and constitutional terms. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Rob Robinson
High Court to Weigh Warrantless Use of GPS in Non-Criminal Cases - bit.ly/wZTp7P (Theresa Marangas, Benjamin Neidl) Open Records and FOIA – Pushing Government Technology into the 21st Century - bit.ly/xv2Ulg (Heidi Maher) Patel v Unite – Order For Investigation of Deleted Internet Forum - bit.ly/xsuqj7 (Chris Dale) Perspective on Legal Search and Document Review – bit.ly/wfbqR0 (Ralph Losey) Policy vs. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm by Leanne Buckley-Thomson
The support of Strasbourg jurisprudence was noted, in particular  the cases of Sergey Kuznetsov v Russia [2008] ECHR 1170, Lucas v UK (App No 39013/02) 18 March 2003, and Appleby v UK (App No 44306/98). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:12 am by David Lat
Cosentino, Joseph Cosentino, Joy Gallup, Karl Hopkins, Karl V. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
And in the same case, Lord Bingham noted that ‘it has been repeatedly and rightly said that what engages the interest of the public may not be material which engages the public interest’. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm by Colin Murray
Elias LJ assessed the fees scheme not simply against the ECHR by also against the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) on the basis that the Court of Human Rights has, in recent cases, considered ECHR rights in light of the provisions of the Covenant (see Demir & Baykara v Turkey (2009) at [85] and Opuz v Turkey (2010) at [185]). [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:06 am by INFORRM
Mr Justice Tugendhat today handed down a short judgment in the case of Gold v Cox ([2012] EWHC 272 (QB)) explaining why he made an interim order to prevent the publication of private and confidential information about Jacqueline Gold, the high-profile Chief Executive of Ann Summers. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 10:52 am by Erik Lundegaard
Grossman, Bingham McCutchen, Business Litigation: "Bingham's Nuclear Weapon" 2009: Bruce A. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am by Kirsten Sjøvoll, Matrix.
The principle espoused by Lord Bingham in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323 should not mean that the domestic courts are bound to a course of inaction. [read post]