Search for: "Blair v. Blair" Results 201 - 220 of 736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2011, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The second cause of action, alleging legal malpractice, is barred under the doctrine of res [*2]judicata by the court's imprimatur of a retaining lien (see Kinberg v Garr, 28 AD3d 245 [2006]; Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242 [2001]; Summit Solomon & Feldesman v Matalon, 216 AD2d 91 [1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 711 [1995]; see generally Blair v Bartlett, 75 NY 150, 154 [1878]). [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The second cause of action, alleging legal malpractice, is barred under the doctrine of res [*2]judicata by the court's imprimatur of a retaining lien (see Kinberg v Garr, 28 AD3d 245 [2006]; Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242 [2001]; Summit Solomon & Feldesman v Matalon, 216 AD2d 91 [1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 711 [1995]; see generally Blair v Bartlett, 75 NY 150, 154 [1878]). [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:56 am
The archive is available online from Footnote.com and includes records related to legal issues such as: The Ardelia Hall Collection of records relating to the Nazi looting of Jewish possessions, including looted art Nuremberg War Crimes Trial proceedings The Slaw.ca entry also mentions two other collections related to the Nuremberg trials: Yale's Avalon Project Harvard's Nuremberg Trials Project Another collection of Nuremberg trial materials is the… [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 9:08 pm
[Birmingham News; Marketwatch; Exxon v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 12:14 am by charonqc
I can see Mr Farage shouting obscenities at opposing football fans and flicking V signs, safe in the knowledge that the Police presence will ensure that there is no ‘physical’ retaliation. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Meg
Thus, as the Supreme Judicial Court explained over 140 years ago in Blair v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 4:15 am
Here, in Reichenbaum v Cilmi ;2009 NY Slip Op 05954 ;Decided on July 21, 2009 ;Appellate Division, Second Department we see one description of the issue:   "The factual allegations in support of the cause of action to recover damages for fraud fail to meet the heightened pleading requirement of CPLR 3016(b) (see Kline v Taukpoint Realty Corp., 302 AD2d 433) and, in any event, the "mere failure to disclose malpractice does not give rise to a cause of… [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:30 am by Andrew Hamm
Blair, in which the court will decide whether the 21st Amendment allows states to impose a residency requirement on applicants for liquor licenses. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
In other words, even if Bolton, Mulvaney, Blair and Duffey all agree to comply with a Senate subpoena to appear, what would they say? [read post]