Search for: "Blowers v. Blowers" Results 201 - 220 of 344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Robert Kreisman
 A lawyer for the facility said  the whistle-blower law did not apply because the employee chose not to meet its reporting requirements. [read post]
Leveson, in the preceding paragraph of the ENRC judgment, states that it is “obviously in the public interest that companies should be prepared to investigate allegations from whistle blowers or investigative journalists, prior to going to a prosecutor such as the SFO, without losing the benefit of legal professional privilege for the work product and consequences of their investigation. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:00 am
The Board's recognition of a "family of marks" is about as rare as a fish in a tree, but in Black & Decker Corp. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 3:52 pm by Michael Fox
Although I have not compared the statutes I can see some parallels to whistle blower statutes, e.g. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:03 am by INFORRM
Oakes prepared a report for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation in 2017 based on leaks from government whistle-blowers. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am by Bonnie Harris
Under the most recent law protecting whistleblowers, the Dodd-Frank Act (the new Financial Reform bill), employers cannot “‘discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, directly or indirectly, or in any other manner discriminate against, a whistle-blower in the terms and conditions of employment because of any lawful act done by the whistle-blower’” (for more information on the new U.S. law see “New Financial Reform Law Provides Incentives for… [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:14 am
State Farm has claimed the whistle-blowers pilfered records pertaining to Scruggs clients, then left to work for his firm. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am by Bonnie Harris
Under the most recent law protecting whistleblowers, the Dodd-Frank Act (the new Financial Reform bill), employers cannot “‘discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, directly or indirectly, or in any other manner discriminate against, a whistle-blower in the terms and conditions of employment because of any lawful act done by the whistle-blower’” (for more information on the new U.S. law see “New Financial Reform Law Provides Incentives for… [read post]