Search for: "Blowers v. Blowers" Results 201 - 220 of 317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am by Bonnie Harris
Under the most recent law protecting whistleblowers, the Dodd-Frank Act (the new Financial Reform bill), employers cannot “‘discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, directly or indirectly, or in any other manner discriminate against, a whistle-blower in the terms and conditions of employment because of any lawful act done by the whistle-blower’” (for more information on the new U.S. law see “New Financial Reform Law Provides Incentives for… [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am by Bonnie Harris
Under the most recent law protecting whistleblowers, the Dodd-Frank Act (the new Financial Reform bill), employers cannot “‘discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, directly or indirectly, or in any other manner discriminate against, a whistle-blower in the terms and conditions of employment because of any lawful act done by the whistle-blower’” (for more information on the new U.S. law see “New Financial Reform Law Provides Incentives for… [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am by Daniel W. Whitney, Esquire
Even when the government takes the case, the whistle-blower remains entitled to an award of up to 25 percent of the settlement or judgment against the wrongdoer.[18] This encompasses both damages and the civil penalty. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 6:17 am by Andrew Delaney
No question many of us would like to be here right nowState v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:11 pm
It is therefore refreshing to find a judicial opinion that actually applies conservative principles.Yesterday, in the case of Murphy v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
The non-asbestos products were pumps, turbines, and blowers, which plaintiffs alleged required asbestos –containing insulation to be affixed when installed in naval ships. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
Cacheris of the Eastern District of Virginia also denied a motion to dismiss by a defendant home health care company allegedly involved in the scheme but granted dismissals to a third company and a home health firm.Billing Fraud: WHISTLE-BLOWER SUIT AGAINST KANSAS HOSPICE PROVIDER SURVIVES, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:36 am by NL
In L G Blower Ltd v Reeves, R had made various offers at various times in varying amounts At one point all previous offers save for a 'May 2007? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:36 am by NL
In L G Blower Ltd v Reeves, R had made various offers at various times in varying amounts At one point all previous offers save for a 'May 2007? [read post]