Search for: "Board of Directors v. Superior Court"
Results 201 - 220
of 543
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 2:58 pm
Indeed, in Levin v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 2:36 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court confirmed in Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:29 am
Their shareholders’ agreement includes provisions that: guarantee each of them a seat on the two-member board of directors and appoint each as co-president; prohibit their removal from the board with or without cause; in the event of death, disability, or resignation, authorize the vacant board seat to be filled by the departing shareholder’s child; require majority (i.e., effectively unanimous) board consent for all… [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 7:39 pm
The decision tracks my November prediction that the Court would follow its reasoning in Ultratec, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Leining v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
Jensen v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:01 am
HomeStreet, Inc., [2] was issued by the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. [read post]
17 May 2018, 7:30 pm
Government Brief Faults Tribal Immunity Logic On June 4th, the Federal Circuit will hear arguments in Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 6:12 am
The former executive director recently filed the lawsuit in Superior Court of California, County of San Diego claiming his firing by the group’s board was personal and not based on performance or any sort of wrongdoing, according to a report from San Diego Reader. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm
Supreme Court has recently agreed to resolve this matter, in the case of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 3:12 pm
Superior Court Kevin D. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 8:05 am
In Segal v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 5:26 am
" Chikindas has been removed from his position as the director of the Center for Digestive Health, and "No Rutgers employee will be required to work in an administrative unit that he heads. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 4:28 pm
Superior Court, No. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 5:35 am
The lawsuit was filed in the California Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:28 am
The employee was the director of talent relations at a TV station. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 2:26 pm
In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court expressly adopted the test articulated by the Delaware Supreme Court in Tooley v. [read post]
