Search for: "Body v. Body"
Results 201 - 220
of 21,186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2019, 11:19 am
In terms of amicus briefs filed with the Ninth Circuit, it's pretty much the same picture again: companies who failed in the mobile phone business and trolls support Qualcomm (as does Makan "Macomm" Delrahim, the Antitrust Assistant Attorney General who used to work for Qualcomm), while the rest of the industry presents a united front and supports the FTC.The collective membership of the four high-tech industry bodies who filed amicus curiae briefs in support of the FTC goes… [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 6:46 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in King v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:56 am
On January 25, in U.S. v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
In Presbytery of Seattle v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 4:14 am
Applicant sought to register the mark STRIPT WAX BAR & Design for "body waxing services for the human body" [WAX BAR disclaimed], but Examining Attorney John Kelly issued a Section 2(d) refusal in view of the registered mark THE WAX BAR for "body waxing services. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:09 pm
Supreme Court denied review in Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:01 pm
In Garcetti v. [read post]
25 Dec 2006, 9:44 am
In Tyler v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:48 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 1:48 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Torres v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:35 am
I have previously posted about a Michigan case, People v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
The post ALONTA BORRELL JOHNSON v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:05 am
Appellant presents the following questions for our review … Read the opinion The post BRIAN CULLEN SHERIDAN v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:02 am
Carl and Cathy’s Jeep suffered no-starts, suspension issues, body and structural problems, electronic issues, and additional serious non-conformities […] The post Carl and Cathy C. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 12:01 pm
POTTER v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:55 am
Body: SC18476 - Duart v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:19 am
Matt Bodie (Saint Louis) has amusing commentary on this tempest in a teapot. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:43 am
JOHNSON, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 10:14 am
R (Swami Suryananda) v Welsh Ministers R (Playfoot) v Millais School Governing Body North v North Software Cellular Network Ltd v T-Mobile (UK) Ltd R (JL) v Home Secretary R v Cemex Cement Ltd Daily Telegraph, 2nd August 2007 Source: www.telegraph.co.uk [read post]
