Search for: "Body v. Taylor"
Results 201 - 220
of 361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2019, 9:11 am
In Thacker v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
(Full disclosure: I was a member of the litigation team challenging Missouri's protocol in one of those cases, Taylor v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:23 am
The 4th Circuit's ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:56 pm
There have been a number of settlements of libel actions which have resulted in apologies but no statement in open court – for example, Ed Buxton v News Group (the “Sun”) and NOW Magazine, Eason v Kordowski (Solicitors from Hell), Sawalha v Phillips (libel on Spectator blog), Laker v News Group (body scanner libel), Islam Expo v Spectator, Forzini v Times Newspapers, Gordon Taylor v Associated… [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Taylor v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
CARTER v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am
When the entire student body protested to state authorities by refusing to re-register, their dining hall was pad-locked in an attempt to starve them into submission. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:06 pm
London is the seat of all government institutions and bodies and the City is one of the leading financial centres of the world (para 46). [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:02 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting in Cincinnati, will hear oral argument in ACLU v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:50 am
Matter of Park v Kapica, 8 N.Y.3d 302John Park, a police officer employed by the Town of Greenburgh, underwent surgery in June 2002 after sustaining an injury in the line of duty. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,[7]the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 11:40 am
In Grogan v Holland Patent Central School District,7 the Appellate Division said that even though the school board had not met and had no opportunity as a body to consider the resignation, the “[d]elivery of the letter of resignation to the clerk of the board constituted delivery to the board. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Rathburn v Onondaga County Library, 90 AD2d 971]Court ReviewEssentially an appointing authority or an arbitrator determines the penalty to be imposed on an individual found guilty of disciplinary charges alleging a particular act or omission.Judicial and quasi-judicial bodies may be asked to determine if the penalty imposed on individuals found guilty of the offenses was reasonable under the circumstances. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:59 am
Judges Hazouri and Taylor (and a third judge) sat on the panel. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:59 am
Judges Hazouri and Taylor (and a third judge) sat on the panel. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 4:06 pm
New Zealand In the case of CPA Australia Limited v New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants [2015] NZHC 1854, Dobson J dismissed a libel action brought by one accountants professional body against another. [read post]
