Search for: "Booker v. Booker"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2010, 3:56 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Booker, R (on the application of) v NHS Oldham & Anor [2010] EWHC 2593 (Admin) (28 October 2010) High Court (Family Division) A Local Authority v DL & Ors [2010] EWHC 2675 (Fam) (25 October 2010) G v B [2010] EWHC 2630 (Fam) (25 October 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 4:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:13 pm
Berman Empirical Questions and Evidence in Rita v. [read post]
9 Mar 2008, 8:10 pm
Booker. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 2:06 pm
Today, the Seventh Circuit in US v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 7:27 am
The Sixth Circuit gets Booker jurisprudence off to a flying start this morning through its ruling in US v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 9:17 am
See Ivan V. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:04 am
 (See, e.g., this paper (In Search of the Booker Revolution) by Ryan Scott at Indiana.) [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
“[S]ection 1B1.10 takes for granted that a defendant who received a ‘downward departure’ in the pre-Booker era received a specific term of imprisonment below his applicable range. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:21 pm
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 8:25 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
16 Aug 2006, 3:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 10:32 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
Bank National Assn. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2005, 2:28 am
Booker and US v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:04 am
US and Claiborne v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 2:22 am
United States, 06-6330 (per Booker, crack guidelines are advisory only; judge may consider crack/powder disparity in sentencing below the guidelines).United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:06 pm
US v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 2:53 pm
See US v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:41 pm
US v. [read post]
