Search for: "Borders v. Borders"
Results 201 - 220
of 7,211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 5:53 am
/Mexico border. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:55 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:38 pm
(Orin Kerr) Back in 2009, I blogged about a fascinating Fourth Amendment district court decision involving how the border search exception applies to computers, United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Learn more about the plaintiffs in Alasaad v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
Once you have removed the border line, you might decide you’d like to disable the automatic borders feature permanently. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:25 am
The opinion, U.S. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 12:42 pm
On Tuesday January 29, 2019, in Procopio v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 5:06 am
Orin Kerr on Volokh Conspiracy:Update on United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 1:29 pm
-Mexico border is illegal. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:18 am
The aim of the procedural initiative is to clarify the administrative procedure that applies in cross-border investigations and enforcement under the GDPR. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 1:39 pm
In D.E. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:47 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
The Commitment Rule is a further development of the proposal we submitted to the Secretariat of UNCITRAL Working Group V (Insolvency) in an open letter on September 14, 2023. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 5:40 pm
Back in October 2009, we commented on U.S. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 1:46 pm
As a result, one principle underlying the caselaw on border searches--namely, that "a port of entry is not a traveler's home," United States v. [read post]
