Search for: "Bose v. Bose"
Results 201 - 220
of 277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm
Cir. 2009), plus a general discussion of the Court’s recent trends in approaches to deciding casesTrademark:· In re Bose Corp., 580 F.3d 1240 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 3:05 am
Consultants, Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:01 am
Hurley Int'l LLC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:32 am
DaimlerChrysler Corporation and Chrysler, LLC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:31 am
Its post-Bose fraud decisions in Enbridge and Asian and Western (Nos. 40 and 42) and its finding of a lack of bona fide intent on the part of the Section 44(e) applicant in Honda v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:57 am
Prior to Bose, under Medinol v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:52 am
Copyright, fictional characters, Salinger6/6/09 – Proposal to Restrict Use of Whole Body Image Scanners as Primary Screening Tool in Airport Security privacy, Proposed legislation, whole body image scanners5/31/09 – Update on Anticipated Appointment of a Cybersecurity Coordinator cybersecurity, government oversight, NSA5/28/09 – Anticipated Appointment of “Cyber Czar” on May 29, 2009 cybersecurity, Dept of Homeland Security, government oversight, NSA, privacy5/20/09… [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:44 am
The Board has begun populating the new post-Bose fraud landscape as trademark practitioners re-calibrate their thinking. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
In In re Bose, the Federal Circuit raised the bar for proving fraud on the PTO. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:38 am
American Sports Licensing, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 2:16 am
Gallo Winery v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Rothschild, Prof Gertrude Neumark - More settlements in and out of court for litigious LED professor (Green Patent Blog) SP Techs - N D Illinois: Inventor not allowed to intervene in patent dispute: SP Techs v Garmin Int’l (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Warner Music – Warner Music and Sony drop XM radio suit (IPKat) US Trademarks Joe Dreitler expounds on… [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 10:54 pm
See NetDepositVerkaik v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:40 pm
Ayush Herbs, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:16 am
American Rice, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright) Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango) China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China’s grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon) Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v Bundesfinanzdirektion Südost (JIPLP)… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music (EDTexweblog.com) BPAI… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
: Imation v Koninklijke Philips Electronics (Patently-O) (IP Spotlight) District Court N D Illinois: Co [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:54 am
Cobra Electronics Corporation, Opposition No. 91162506 [Opposition to registration of the mark COBRA.for vehicle alarm systems on the grounds of lack of bona fide intent and likelihood of confusion with Opposer's snake-branded vehicle security, vehicle remote start, and vehicle tracking products].November 12, 2009 - 10 AM: Bose Corporation v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations:… [read post]
