Search for: "Bower v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
Texas) and Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 2:11 pm
Texas, the opinion that overruled Bowers v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:23 am
Moreover, I would argue that plea bargaining in this country is in a constant state of flux, especially in the wake of the Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:13 am
"There's an inevitable collision here," Bower says. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
The University of Virginia School of Law's culture in the 1980s was the culture of Justice Lewis Powell, the Justice from Richmond, Virginia who (erroneously) thought he had never met a "homosexual" and who was willing to join the Court's opinion in Bowers v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
” Examining the claim for a violation of substantive due process the court addressed the application of 42 USC 1983 in the context of land use disputes: “"In the land use context, 42 USC § 1983 protects against municipal actions that violate a property owner's rights to due process, equal protection of the laws and just compensation for the taking of property under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution"… [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am
” Examining the claim for a violation of substantive due process the court addressed the application of 42 USC 1983 in the context of land use disputes: “"In the land use context, 42 USC § 1983 protects against municipal actions that violate a property owner's rights to due process, equal protection of the laws and just compensation for the taking of property under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution"… [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 6:07 am
The court ruled in 1986 in Bowers v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 2:06 pm
See Bowers v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:56 am
The Shot Heard Around the LGBT World: Bowers v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Evans, to overturn Bowers v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:09 pm
Rawls thought that the Supreme Court's deliberations and opinions about the meaning of the United States Constitution exemplified the idea of public reason.Historical Perspective Where does the idea of public reason come from? [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
Your votes for president and the United States Senate determine the Supreme Court's nine occupants. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
United Illuminating, 1998 WL 910271, at *10 (Conn. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:05 pm
This is so because, in 1998, the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia struck down OCGA § 16-6-2(a), a statute crimnalizing all acts of sodomy, as an unconstitutional violation of privacy protections afforded under Georgia's constitution.In an ironic twist, this was the very same act that the Supreme Court of the United States held constitutional in Bowers v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
District Court in Boston under the name of Gill v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Cardiologists implanted a covered stent manufactured by NuMed, Inc., a New York corporation that is one of the few developers of pediatric medical devices in the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 9:44 am
Bowers, James R. [read post]
