Search for: "Brady v. State of California" Results 201 - 220 of 302
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2011, 9:00 am by Nathaniel Grow
Boies, of course, previously represented the NFL owners in the Brady v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
Plata, the California prison overcrowding case decided in June. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari Petitioners’ reply Amicus brief of America’s Health Insurance Plans Amicus brief of American Hospital Association Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of Western Center for Journalism (forthcoming) Amicus brief of The California Endowment Brief of state respondents   National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:44 pm by Michael O'Hear
Ct. 1350 (2011) (a district attorney’s office may not be held liable under § 1983 for failure to train its prosecutors based on a single Brady violation). [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 8:36 am by Kiera Flynn
Lambert Docket: 11-38   Issue: Did the Third Circuit fail to properly apply the habeas deference standard to the state court’s rejection of respondent’s Brady claim? [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm by Kiera Flynn
Petition for certiorari (forthcoming) Brief in opposition (forthcoming) Amicus brief of Northern California Relief (forthcoming)   Downing/Salt Pond Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:31 am by Russ Bensing
Plata - Court upholds Federal court order finding constitutional violations in California’s prison overcrowding, and requiring the state to reduce its prison population. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Michael O'Brien
Under the California State Constitution, an original habeas petition can be filed in either the a California county Superior Court, California Court of Appeal or the California Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:44 pm by cdw
Still working through the various SCOTUS developments and a case from California. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by John Elwood
Louisiana, 10-8145, raising Brady and due process claims and previously relisted once, and in Setser v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:19 pm by Colin O'Keefe
 We have a wealth of varying viewpoints on AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:20 am by Steve Hall
The district attorney conceded that it violated its obligations under Brady v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
California Public Utilities Commission, 10-838, for Talk America, Inc. v Michigan Bell Telephone Co., 10-313 and Isiogu v. [read post]