Search for: "Branch v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 4,773
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637, affd 35 NY3d 173; see Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d at 785). [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
There, Lord Hoffmann questioned the appropriateness of the term deference in describing the relationship between the courts and other branches of state within the separation of powers. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 11:53 am
The qui tam cases are captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 5:55 am
United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:02 pm
United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 3:03 pm
United States. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 1:04 pm
United States, a case involving federal sentencing laws that – at least according to the defendant – turns on whether the word “and” in the federal law at issue means “and” or instead “or. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am
" Similarly, the United States Supreme Court has explained that government employees have certain limitations on their freedom that they must accept in the workplace. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:22 am
Three years ago, in Seila Law v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 7:44 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
One could not confidently say the same of the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
(The Doe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:48 pm
For instance, in Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
The United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 10:59 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
That has often left the executive branch as the only source of public legal opinions on war powers—issued in the form of Office of Legal Counsel memoranda or testimony and speeches by Executive Branch lawyers. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Part 1 of this piece can be found here. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:19 am
In Virden v. [read post]
