Search for: "Brand v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 6,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 8:18 am by Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC
 Imposing additional brand-name drug exclusivity only keeps already high brand drug prices out of reach for patients for longer. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Tasting the TM in Pepsi/Coke studies.What we know about brands v. what we know about TMs—Deven Desai has written about the distinction and the lack thereof that has been part of the problem. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 6:28 pm
It was originally said that the two powerhouse brands would have a private mediation, however, after three years the case is now a full blown out feud. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 9:00 am by Kalvis Golde
United States and Romag Fasteners v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 2:29 pm by Antonio Dempsey
The intersection of free speech and private business branding is once again in front of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:58 pm by The Complex Litigator
Ct. 1187 (2009), the Supreme Court determined that state law failure-to-warn claims against brand name manufacturers were not preempted by federal law. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
The attorneys will cover the costs and then “recover the money from Tiger Brands. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Ct. at 2578-81.Mensing held that requesting FDA assistance would not have satisfied the manufacturer’s state law duty to provide adequate labeling as the manufacturer could then comply with state labeling requirements “if, and only if, the FDA and the brand-name manufacturer changed the brand-name label to do so. [read post]