Search for: "Briggs v. Briggs"
Results 201 - 220
of 504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
Briggs, 309 F. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 1:36 pm
The actual impact of the decision in Rockwell International Corp. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:44 am
" Exmark Manufacturing Company Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 1:40 am
v=KQye7T4J2W0 Originally posted at InjuryBoard by Laurie Briggs [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:46 am
Amanda Blackhorse, Marcus Briggs-Cloud, Philip Gover, Jillian Pappan, and Courtney Tsotigh v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
Abuse: The judge noted that following the decision of Mr Justice Briggs (as he then was) in Sectorguard Plc v Dienne Plc [2009] EWHC 2693 (Ch) the pursuit of any litigation must be proportionate. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:30 am
Lord Briggs gave the main judgment. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:01 am
DISTRICT COURTWESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKEmployment Black 'Plant Manager' Loses Unlawful Discharge Claim But States Title VII Salary Bias Claim Briggs v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
In case he was wrong about this, Briggs J went on to consider whether the ability of GMAC to sell the property without a court order was in the public interest. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:11 am
Lord Briggs and Lord Sales reject this. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am
The Supreme Court On 24 January 2018, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs heard the appeal in the Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 9:28 am
Many thanks to Adrian Briggs for the tip-off. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:35 am
Lords Sumption and Lloyd-Jones give the lead judgments, with which Lords Mance, Hodge and Briggs agree. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:26 am
It therefore unanimously dismissed the appeal, in which Lord Briggs gave the leading judgment. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:22 am
Aisling O’Dwyer, an associate in the IP team and Ella Wells, a trainee patent attorney at CMS, comment on the decision which is awaited in the matter of Shanks v Unilever Plc & Ors. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:25 am
In Regeneron v Kymab (IPKat post here), a patent was found enabled and thus sufficiently disclosed despite the example methods provided in the specification being unworkable at the time of the invention. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am
For Lord Briggs, this was a clear forfeiture clause. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 7:07 am
State & Michael Rippo v State. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:00 pm
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335,341,344–45 (1986). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 4:53 pm
Yet in the case of United States v. [read post]
