Search for: "Broadcom Corporation" Results 201 - 220 of 263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2007, 6:13 am
That did not take into account the H.264 mess and the Broadcom litigations. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:05 am
(In the study, I look at approximately 15,000 utility patents issued in April and May 2008.) [2]  National Tool: Over half of the recently issued patents that listed an assignee indicated that the assignee was a foreign (non-U.S.) corporation or agency.[4]  Although foreign entities are not prohibited from filing provisional applications, the provisional tool was designed to benefit U.S. entities. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:02 am by Kevin LaCroix
(The first instance is the Broadcom settlement, about which refer here.) [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The result: The announcement that Qualcomm will pay Broadcom $891 million as part of an agreement to end several patent and antitrust cases against each other. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 2:55 am
The companies were under enormous pressure to demonstrate (under the then-applicable McNulty Memo and its predecessor the Thompson memo, about which refer here, specifying the guidelines for corporate prosecution) that it was "cooperating fully" with government officials. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 2:52 am
Thus for example, in both the lawsuit that Luminent Mortgage Corporation filed against Merrill Lynch (refer here) and in the First Marblehead subprime-related securities class action lawsuit (refer here), the courts quoted with approval language from a prior RICO case in which the Second Circuit said "when the plaintiff’s loss coincides with a marketwide phenomenon causing comparable losses to other investors, the prospect that plaintiffs’ loss was caused by… [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Every fall, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and D&O insurance. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included: European Commission launches consultation on ‘Content Online in the Single Market': (IPKat), (Out-Law), (IPR Helpdesk), UK government launches consultation on copyright exceptions: (IPKat), (Michael Geist), (IMPACT), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Out-Law), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), Cordis Corporation - US Court of… [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 12:04 pm by Richard Altieri, Benjamin Della Rocca
In March 2018, President Trump quashed Broadcom’s attempted takeover of U.S. chipmaker Qualcomm, reportedly for fear that the deal would help China jump ahead in the race to develop 5G technology. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:17 am by Kevin LaCroix
If the advance funding of corporate governance ref [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:40 am by Kashmir Hill
The six were outside counsel for the technology company in a patent dispute with Broadcom and got caught up in an electronic discovery scandal – tens of thousands of documents were not turned over in the case. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:30 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The centerpiece of the lawsuit was an allegedly fraudulent $500 million reinsurance transaction in which various AIG insiders staged an elaborate artificial transaction with Gen Re Corporation. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:20 am
Broadcom dispute, in which Qualcomm employees and counsel failed to timely produce important and relevant documents and were sanctioned by the district court for that failure in a series of highly-publicized rulings and decisions. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 12:08 am
Rival chip maker Broadcom sued Qualcomm in California, New Jersey and Washington, D.C.; Nokia filed suits in Delaware and D.C.; and four other wireless companies filed complaints with the European Commission. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
For many years, one of Sky’s clients had been Franklin Credit Mortgage Corporation. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 10:10 am by Dennis Crouch
Broadcom Corporation (No. 2015-1944, -1945, -1946), I wanted to share a few thoughts on what, exactly, should be reviewable under 35 USC 314(d). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
To cite just two examples, in prior posts I have detailed the huge defense expenses that accumulated in the Broadcom options backdating lawsuit (refer here) and in connection with the Collins & Aikman bankruptcy (refer here). [read post]