Search for: "Brooks v. The State of California"
Results 201 - 220
of 394
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
Brooks Brothers, Inc. v. [read post]
College Football Predictions for FBS Week 3 2012 by SportPundit and the Yards Per Play System YPPSYS
10 Sep 2012, 12:12 pm
Result: Stony Brook v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court, because those interests implicated… [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Christina Aguilera, Katy Perry, Steve Tyler, Lionel Richie and Garth Brooks were just some of music’s biggest names want to make it harder to pirate music online calling for “drastic reforms” to the Act.In [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Terry, No. 150012/2012, Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law a bill that allows California residents to sue any other individual who manufactures, distributes, purchases, sells, or otherwise transports illegal guns into the state. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
There were three consequences of this removal: first, Fortnite could not be downloaded to an Apple device; secondly, previously installed iOS versions of Fortnite could not be updated; and, thirdly, Apple device users could not play against players who had the latest version of Fortnite.[22] 4 The Proceedings On the same day as Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, Epic commenced antitrust proceedings in the United States District Court… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:55 am
Feb. 19, 2009). http://kuex.us/82ed State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
: (Part 1 - SPICY IP), (Part 2 - SPICY IP) Global – Copyright International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI): ‘Three strikes’ effort hit worldwide home run: (Ars Technica), How to attribute a Creative Commons licensed work: (Molly Kleinman), Chrysalis disappoints, as new artists fail to incubate: (IP finance), DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) Events 26 August:… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:11 am
California, in which the Court held that police must obtain a warrant before they can search the cellphone of someone whom they have arrested. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
Based on an exception articulated in Montana v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am
State Bar of California and Lathrop v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:57 am
MDEQ v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
: (Techdirt), Microsoft Research launches new tools for knowledge sharing: (creativecommons.org), Yet another star singer, Duffy, doesn’t mind file-sharing: (Techdirt) Events 20 August – Bill Patry speaking on copyright – Melbourne: (Patry Copyright Blog), (LawFont.com), 21 August – Bill Patry speaking on copyright – Canberra: (Patry Copyright Blog), (LawFont.com), 22 August – Bill Patry speaking on copyright – Sydney:… [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Because AT&T's pension payments accord with a bona fide seniority system's terms, they are insulated from challenge under Title VII §703(h).o May 18, 2009 decision hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSwiki hereo Noted here: Reuters; Connecticut Employment Law Blog; Yahoo; WAPO; Christian Science Monitor; Bloomberg; Shaw Valenza; NYTimes; FYI: Central Ohio Employment Law Update; Ross Runkel; Paul Mollica; SCOTUSblog (opinion recap); Fisher &… [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Searle & Co., 806 S.W.2d 608, 613 (Ark. 1991).California: Carlin v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
State of California, 72 Cal. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 7:06 am
I'll also include my name here (Ted Brooks) as your California connection. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
At least some lower California courts have agreed, but in Martinez v. [read post]
