Search for: "Brown v Doe"
Results 201 - 220
of 5,864
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Public employee not always entitled to a name-clearing hearingBrown v Simmons, 478 F.3d 922The lesson in Brown v Simmons is that a public employee is not entitled to a name-clearing hearing to rebut statements of a defamatory nature except when he or she has been terminated by the employer. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:59 am
But what does this mean in practice? [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:51 pm
It would have overturned a California Supreme Court decision, People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:13 am
Judge Brown, relying on the until-now latest No Fly List case, Ibrahim v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 11:32 am
You can instead stand on the complaint, as plaintiff does here, and appeal.Plaintiff files precisely such an appeal. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 8:27 am
In Article V, Section 14 of the Oregon Constitution, the governor has the power to commute all convictions other than treason. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm
The Procopio v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 4:22 pm
Patent attorney Jill Browning attended today’s Tafas v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:31 am
Ginsburg has called Loving “one of the most important decisions” in history, “as important, if not more important, than Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:06 pm
Clemon urged Biden not to nominate Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court in light of her decision in Ross v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 11:56 am
Her call.That does indeed seem to be what the rule says. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
As a "flight" of some sort that may well suggest criminality.I doubt that a majority of the Supreme Court would conclude as the panel does here. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:30 pm
Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH)On Friday, US Senator Sherrod Brown (Democrat-Ohio) said Allergan's transfer of six patents covering its medicinal product Restasis (for the treatment of dry-eyes) to the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe "rips off consumers". [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
In that respect, this case resembles the recent Florida case, Heiderich v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:30 am
Brown v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:26 pm
The court concludes that it does, although that conclusion strikes me as incorrect. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:17 am
v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 10:42 am
Perry v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
How far does this claim on a state’s resources extend? [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 8:48 am
On November 29, 2010, Northern District Court judge, Saundra Brown Armstrong, granted plaintiff’s motion to remand a PAGA action (predicated on alleged overtime, meal and rest period violations) on the grounds that a PAGA representative action does not trigger CAFA jurisdiction as a matter of law. [read post]
