Search for: "Brown v. Harris" Results 201 - 220 of 663
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2018, 10:33 am by Sandy Levinson
 And then there was Roe (written, of course, by Harry Blackmun, Richard Nixon's appointee). [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:38 pm by Jeff Gamso
Kristoff's op-ed grew out of a dissenting opinion by 9th Circuit Judge William Fletcher in Cooper v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm by John Elwood
Thus, the court denied cert in Harris v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
The story of how we got to Roe, like the story of how we got to Brown v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:38 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
  While these two speakers and their topics were incredibly different, both had a similar underlying message: the work that trial lawyers do is incredibly important   First, there was Justice Jackson, a rock-star of a trial lawyer who served as both Solicitor General and Attorney General for the United States before joining the United States Supreme Court where he authored many important decisions including Brown v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Brown Rudnick Berlak Israels LLP, 111 AD3d 444, 444 (1st Dep’t 2013); Hass & Gottlieb v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Peter Margulies
In a puzzling turn that EO-3’s challengers need to address at the Supreme Court, the INA argument only got five votes on the Fourth Circuit (Judges Gregory, Wynn, Harris, Diaz, and Thacker), while three generally liberal judges (Harris, Motz, and King) joined the majority on the constitutional issue but felt that the statutory issue was too complex to resolve. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 6:50 pm by Jean O'Grady
Shenkman, Senior Manager, KM Counsel & Research, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Patrick V. [read post]