Search for: "Brown v. Unknown" Results 201 - 220 of 314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Regardless, plaintiffs argued that they were entitled to strict scrutiny because required “sexually explicit” labels on video games had been struck down by the Seventh Circuit, and Brown v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:05 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
The argument took place before a panel consisting of Judges David Sentelle, Janice Brown, and Thomas Griffith. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 9:19 am
  This week’s highlight comes to us from the Francis Cabell Brown Collection. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 2:04 am by INFORRM
Truth versus Protection of Journalist Sources: the Canadian Supreme Court The Canadian Supreme Court case of R v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
In People v Brown, 253 Mich 537; 235 NW 245 (1931), the Court noted that the right to keep and bear arms is subject to regulations, but stressed that such regulations “cannot constitutionally result in the prohibition of the possession of those arms which, by the common opinion and usage of law-abiding people, are proper and legitimate to be kept upon private premises for the [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:22 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Supp. 2d 51, 54-55 (D.D.C. 2009) and Judge Kollar-Kotelly in Al Mutairi v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:57 am by Contributor
Fournier, 2010 ONSC 2126 (CanLII), Brown J. ultimately denied this motion. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
When they were published in the article, they were, as the passages just quoted from the judgment show, and as the journalists must have appreciated, no more than unsubstantiated unchecked accusations, from an unknown source, coupled with speculation. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
When they were published in the article, they were, as the passages just quoted from the judgment show, and as the journalists must have appreciated, no more than unsubstantiated unchecked accusations, from an unknown source, coupled with speculation. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
When they were published in the article, they were, as the passages just quoted from the judgment show, and as the journalists must have appreciated, no more than unsubstantiated unchecked accusations, from an unknown source, coupled with speculation. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm by Law Lady
Moody Jr. of the Middle District of Florida said.Bad Faith: DENIAL OF COVERAGE FOR 'VALLEY FEVER' ISN'T BAD FAITH, Brown v. [read post]