Search for: "Buckley v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 292
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 4:56 am
Having fundamentally misunderstood the nature of invention, the United States Supreme Court has dealt a potentially disastrous blow to personalized medicine in its decision in Mayo v Prometheus, which invalidated Prometheus’s claim to a diagnostic correlation. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
An “Officer of the United States” is, according to the Supreme Court, “any appointee exercising significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
Such communications must use the “magic words” articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:39 am
See Leanne Buckley-Thomson’s analysis in the UKHRB. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:03 pm
That right of all, rooted in the First Amendment, was sustained as far back as the Supreme Court’s ruling in 1976 in Buckley v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:28 am
Floyd said no—individuals could always spend as much as they wanted on elections since Buckley v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
The case was eventually appealed to the United States Supreme Court which found in Burton v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 4:58 pm
Citizens United, with an assist from a 1976 decision Buckley v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:38 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:42 am
Tom Udall (D., N.M.) has proposed just such an amendment, which would reverse both Citizens United and the 1976 Buckley v Valeo decision, which held that spending money is a form of speech. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:13 pm
, Election Law Journal (forthcoming 2011) (draft available) Citizens United and the Orphaned Antidistortion Rationale, 27 Georgia State Law Review 989 (2011) (symposium on Citizens United) The Nine Lives of Buckley v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm
Gore Does Not Suck Buckley is Dead, Long Live Buckley: The New Campaign Finance Incoherence of McConnell v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:55 pm
” So, Move to Amend is also looking to overturn the 1976 Buckley v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 9:44 am
The resolution before the L.A. council not only aims to reverse Citizens United, but also Buckley v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:35 am
" This, of course, returns us to the question of Buckley (and obliquely, Citizens United) of whether money is speech. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:16 pm
Counteracting the 2010 Citizens United case and the 1976 Buckley v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:08 am
The real villain in the piece is much older than Citizens United -- it's Buckley v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
The uniting thread among the various factions within the Progressive Movement was the view that government in the United States had become systematically corrupt. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:15 pm
United States: Elliott Welsh’s Two Religious TestsAndrew KoppelmanChapter 11Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
The proposed amendment would also reverse the 1976 decision Buckley v Valeo, which held that spending money is a form of speech in elections. [read post]
