Search for: "Burrows v. State"
Results 201 - 203
of 203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
L&Q -v- Ansell appears to state that, once the arrears and costs set out in the Possession Order have been paid, the occupier ceases to be a ‘tolerated trespasser’ in the sense of Burrows because their occupation is no longer subject to s.85 Housing Act 1985 - either in terms of execution of the order or possible application for variation of the order. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 7:24 am
See United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:08 am
Burrowes. [read post]
