Search for: "Bush v. Jackson"
Results 201 - 220
of 301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2011, 7:59 am
Bush administration. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
He's posted a PDF of Jones v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 7:39 am
Even in the Florida 2000 election case of Bush v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
Sotomayor says she doesn't want to answer the question, but eventually waxes poetically about Justice Cardozo. 10:55: Kohl wants to know what Sotomayor thinks about affirmative-action and Bush v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
And, the Court’s decision 23 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm
Instead, Kavanaugh appeared receptive to a version of the theory, outlined by Chief Justice William Rehnquist in a concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
But author Evan Thomas, in his 2019 biography of O’Connor, reported that in March 1952, after Rehnquist had left Stanford for a clerkship at the Supreme Court with Justice Robert Jackson, Rehnquist proposed to Sandra in a letter from Washington. [read post]
26 May 2010, 11:15 am
” Anyone who doubts his intellectual toughness and his willingness to engage in sharp debate should just take a look at his dissents over the last ten years, from Bush v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Monday’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 11:02 am
Bush administration, the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Jackson Women's Health Organization between Roe and Plessy v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Jackson[1] Professor Levinson has been using his powerful scholarly voice for years now to call our attention to the increasingly hard to justify mal-distribution of the Senate and the way its democratic deficits are hard-wired into our present constitutional architecture.[2]This structural defect is related to the question of Supreme Court reform. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
The case, by the way, was Bogle v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 3:05 pm
Moore-Bush, 381 F.Supp.3d 139 (D. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
Bush, Barack Obama, and a majority of the Ninth Circuit panel that decided the case below (um, a recusal issue there?). [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:15 am
” When he says “we’ll have the ability to,” it stinks of Andrew Jackson’s purported reaction to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Worcester v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
All are glad to not be part of this while at the same time getting tons and tons of attention - Rick Santorum changes sweater vests for the sixth time since the convention began - Twitter trends are scoured to determine 'likeability' for each candidate - Based on the social media tallies and input from the Congressional Budget Office, a winner is determined - Wolf Blitzer has a minor exasperation-induced heart attack on live television; two commentators from Fox… [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm
Environmental organizations argue that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 7:22 pm
Pursuant to Code Crim.Proc., § 280 and as held in People v Jackson, People v Krank, except where time is a material ingredient of the crime the prosecution is not confined in its evidence to the precise date laid in the indictment, but may prove that the offense was committed at any time prior to the commencement of the prosecution and such proof does not constitute a material variance. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 am
Kavanaugh indicated that he would adopt the “straightforward” test outlined by Rehnquist in Bush v. [read post]
