Search for: "Byrd v. Byrd"
Results 201 - 220
of 485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
This precise issue was addressed by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 8:07 am
Byrd’s legal malpractice action against appellee, Melvin I. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:13 pm
Fredrick v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:14 pm
Judge Marjorie Rendell wrote a concurring opinion in Byrd v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:14 pm
Judge Marjorie Rendell wrote a concurring opinion in Byrd v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:17 am
The parties in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:51 pm
Or so said Justice Scalia, answering a nutty hypothetical question he asked himself whilst concurring in Mullenix v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:15 am
See Pasco v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 6:12 am
The Court noted that in Byrd v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 9:01 am
Dillon v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:55 am
The Court of Appeals affirms, and the case is gone.The case is Hayden v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
VanderKam v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:45 am
Posted by Charles Sartain USA v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
The district court observed that in Williams v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:24 am
Several people (including Senator Cruz, Eugene Kontorovich, Mike Pompeo and David Rivkin, and a majority of the members of the House of Representatives) have argued that the Iran Review Act bars the President from lifting U.S. sanctions against Iran. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 6:50 am
Byrd in which the Supreme Court held that individual members lack standing. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
Byrd), and noted that the U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 11:56 am
However, at the hearing, respondent, citing Matter of Ruiz v MVAIC (19 AD2d 832 [2d Dept 1963]) and Byrd v Johnson (60 AD2d 900 [2d Dept 1978]) and their progeny, argued further that, even if the court is satisfied that petitioner has otherwise complied with subdivision (b) of section 5218 of the Insurance Law, petitioner, in order to satisfy the "reasonable efforts" requirement of subdivision (b) (5), must first exhaust his remedy and conclude a subdivision (c)… [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:56 am
However, at the hearing, respondent, citing Matter of Ruiz v MVAIC (19 AD2d 832 [2d Dept 1963]) and Byrd v Johnson (60 AD2d 900 [2d Dept 1978]) and their progeny, argued further that, even if the court is satisfied that petitioner has otherwise complied with subdivision (b) of section 5218 of the Insurance Law, petitioner, in order to satisfy the “reasonable efforts” requirement of subdivision (b) (5), must first exhaust his remedy and conclude a subdivision… [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:22 am
Byrd, Jr., was found guilty of possession of a controlled dangerous substance (CDS). [read post]
