Search for: "C/o Bell"
Results 201 - 220
of 352
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2013, 8:22 pm
May 8, 2013 On April 29th, the Federal Government introduced a new budget bill (Bill C-60) that includes, wedged into its some 230+ sections, proposed amendments to the Investment Canada Act (“ICA”) that will potentially impact the review of proposed investments in Canada by state-owned-enterprises (“SOEs”). [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:03 am
Pollack: once the message is out there, you can’t unring the bell. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 7:53 am
The (unlinkable) OED defines "lush" (the intransitive verb) to mean "To drink, indulge in drink." 1811 Lexicon Balatronicum, Lush, to drink. 1825 C. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm
C. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:55 am
“[C]harges were billed to a party who had never agreed to pay for them in the hope of tricking that party into assuming a payment obligation. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Under this interpretation, there could never be “self-inflicted wound” as there was in O’Hara. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
The Court decided that: (i) D pays C’s costs on the standard basis up to 16 Dec 2010 (ii) There be no order of costs between 17 Dec 2010 and 10 April 2011 (owing to the temporary withdrawal of the offer) (iii) C pays D’s costs after that date on the standard basis, including the costs of the trial and appeal. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 1:01 pm
Bell, 69 S.W.3d 171, 176 (Tenn. 2002)). [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:05 am
Kay Bell, What happens if the electoral vote is tied? [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:47 pm
“The CRTC’s well-reasoned decision to deny Bell’s application to acquire Astral addressed concerns of Canadians and consumers about the scope and impact of this transaction. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Caron, C. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:34 am
The most significant holding is the August 14, 2012 decision in the Northern District of Georgia in the Haven Trust case, in which Judge Steve C. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Bell Agoraphilia Chapman M Kenneth A. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Bell, 649 N.W. 2d 243, 252 (2002) (citing N.D. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:44 am
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:52 pm
Well, wrong-o, Moosebreath. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
A high-profile week at the Leveson Inquiry, with evidence from Rebekah Brooks, the MailOnline editor Martin Clarke and Andy Coulson (see Natalie Peck’s Inforrm roundup). [read post]
6 May 2012, 3:23 pm
” Id. at *3.If you haven’t yet had a case fall apart because of cell phone records, Dorsey sounds a warning bell. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Among the important questions that will need to be answered in connection with the current wave of failed bank litigation is the question of extent to which the non-director officers will be able to defend themselves in reliance on the business judgment rule. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:21 am
State, 43 So. 3d 843 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Bell v. [read post]
