Search for: "C & D Holdings, LLC" Results 201 - 220 of 1,537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2022, 7:10 am by Rob Robinson
Morgan (Investor)Note: Funding Secured for Working Capital 10-November-21Driven (Merger)Innovative Discovery (Merger) 3-November-21Digital Safe Product Line of Micro FocusSmarshNote: Announced with intent to close in Q1 2022 2-November-21Everlaw (Investee)TPG (Lead) with HIG Growth Partners, Capital G, Menlo Ventures, Andreessen Horowitz and K9 Ventures.Series D Funding for $202,000,000 27-October-21Nextpoint (Investee)Sterling National Bank and Bigfoot Capital (Investors)Note: $4,500,000… [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by R. David Donoghue
CZS Holdings LLC d/b/a Pur360, No. 20 C 6886, Slip Op. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 8:20 am by Rob Robinson
(Merger) (Combined Company Now Rampiva Global LLC) 29-Sep-20Acuity ELMMitratech 28-Sep-20GlobanetVeritas 8-Sep-20HaiveAyfie 3-Sep-20IntegroInnovative Discovery 19-Aug-20Venio Systems (Investee)Software Growth Partners (Investor) 13-Aug-20CaseLinesThomson Reuters 11-Aug-20NexLPReveal 5-Aug-20AnexsysXact Data Discovery 4-Aug-20NightOwl Global (Merger)HaystackID (Merger) 31-Jul-20Tracker CorpMitratech 14-Jul-20LightSpeedXact Data Discovery 8-Jul-20RVMXact Data Discovery 7-Jul-20NetGovernIpro… [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
§ 1052(c) provides, in pertinent part, that the PTO must deny federal registration to a trademark if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular individual except by his written consent…. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm by Andrew Hamm
§ 47-1827(b), (c), and (d) violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment by criminalizing trespass by deception at animal facilities with intent to damage the enterprise. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:37 pm by Bill Marler
Pursuant to Rule 26(c)(3), of the New Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, the amount in controversy exceeds $300,000.00, qualifying this claim for a Tier 3 standard discovery. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
 November 24, 2021Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state In Matter of Phillip D.S. --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5364714, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[33] To support its position that the balancing requirement does not apply to ETSs, OSHA relies on the Supreme Court’s reasoning in the 1981 Cotton Dust ruling.[34] However, while the Court in that case did hold that a cost-benefit analysis is not required with respect to § 6(b)(5) permanent standards, it did not address whether such an analysis is required with respect to § 6(c) ETSs.[35]Notably, in an ETS challenge decided after the Supreme Court’s… [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am by Richard Hunt
University Partners LLC et al, 2021 WL 5038780 (D. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:45 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
As the Court framed the issues: [D]efendants argue that: (1) the copy of the operating agreement plaintiff provided is only signed by three of the 14 members of defendant 391 Broadway LLC and therefore unenforceable; [and] (2) the operating agreement was entered into more than six months after 391 Broadway LLC filed its Articles of Organization and is therefore invalid under § 417 (c) of New York Limited Liability Law. [read post]