Search for: "C Booker" Results 201 - 220 of 334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Adam Wagner
It is questionable how much due diligence John Hemming MP did before he made the mother in this case, who has now been exposed as a liar, a cause célèbre in the super-injunction debate. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 10:11 am
In this case, the Circuit holds that the most common post-Booker claims about procedural unreasonableness - that the district court did not make adequate findings under § 3553(a), and that it did not provide a sufficient statement of reasons under § 3553(c), which are neither "novel" nor "complex" - must be objected to at the time of sentencing. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:35 am by Douglas Berman
Booker, which recast the federal sentencing guidelines as “effectively advisory. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm by Susan Klein
United States that such sentencing modification cannot be used as a method for judges to apply Booker sentencing discretion to pre-Booker cases. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm by familoo
When she woke up she was told that the child had been delivered by C-section and taken into care. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 11:05 am by John Floyd
  The Seventh Circuit pointed out that while the sentencing guidelines have been advisory since 2005 with Booker v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
.* Plaintiff's § 1983 claims were, in effect, appeals from state court decisions on the same issues, and they were barred by the Booker-Feldman doctrine. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
§ 3582(c)(2), a context closely analogous to Rule 35(b) reductions. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:11 am by Jon Sands
Evid. 801(d)(2)(C). [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 11:45 am
"[C]ourts may not sentence on the basis of facts that apply to whole classes of crimes. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:38 pm by Michael O'Hear
 Consistent with the general premises of post-Booker federal sentencing, I favor the more discretionary approach. [read post]