Search for: "C. v. A." Results 201 - 220 of 61,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2019, 10:34 am by Diana Skaggs
KRS 405.021(1)(b), (c), Subsections of Grandparent Visitation Statute, Not Unconstitutional – Published Opinion from Kentucky Court of Appeals Diana Skaggs Mon, 10/07/2019 - 13:34 Read more about KRS 405.021(1)(b), (c), Subsections of Grandparent Visitation Statute, Not Unconstitutional – Published Opinion from Kentucky Court of AppealsRobison, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 10:43 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I was on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal this morning discussing the Supreme Court’s pending Fourth Amendment case Kentucky v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:01 pm by Staff
C. had been married to a wife whom he had found on the internet from another country. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 5:04 pm by Aviation LawProf
Yesterday, Advocate General Yves Bot of the Court of Justice for the European Union (CJEU) delivered his opinion in Case C-12/11, Denise McDonagh v Ryanair Ltd. [read post]
29 May 2024, 1:00 am by The Nonprofit Blogger Named Below
That is the potentially blockbuster case concerning the political speech restrictions in IRC 501(c)(3). [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:56 am
Regina (TNT Post UK Ltd) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (Royal Mail Group Ltd, interested party) Case C-357/07 Court of Justice of the European Communities “The Royal Mail was exempt from value-added tax as a supplier of public postal services, except for supplies of goods or services whose terms had been individually negotiated. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:13 am
The Court made that clear in its judgment in Case C-110/05 Commission v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:57 am by tracey
Regina v S(C): [2012] EWCA Crim 389;  [2012] WLR (D)  54 “Where the purpose of a legislative scheme was to ensure that a child could be subject to the protection of the court, there would be no defence of necessity available in respect of the offence of removing a child from the jurisdiction of England and Wales.” WLR Daily, 29th February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:24 am
MH (Syria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; DS (Afghanistan) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 226; [2009] WLR (D) 109 “A careful approach was to be applied when one was considering an asylum application and the question whether an asylum-seeker was excluded from the provisions of the Refugee Convention by reason of art 1F(c) [...] [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 8:37 am by Eric Goldman
ShutterStock, Inc., 1:22-cv-00905-JHR (SDNY Oct. 2, 2023) The post Photo Licensing Service Qualifies for DMCA 512(c) Safe Harbor–McGucken v. [read post]