Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,376
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2018, 8:56 pm
In Ortega v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:43 pm
On November 1, 2018, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District affirmed a trial court’s ruling in AMN Healthcare, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 8:10 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in California Trucking Association v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 4:02 am
TAT Capital Partners, Ltd, Defendant/Respondent (Opinion, Court of Appeal for the State of California)Everett Man Charged in Superseding Indictment for Additional Securities Fraud Scheme (DOJ Release)U.S. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:21 pm
People v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 11:16 am
Superior Court, 37 Cal. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 5:41 am
The trial court jury in Webb v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:55 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California recently released orders involving discharged employees. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 6:00 pm
Primetech Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 8:17 am
In the Courts (3 cases) REAL ESTATE AGENTS ARE INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS UNDER NEW INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC STATE LAW. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
This shift to state courts "is exactly what Congress sought to prevent when it enacted SLUSA" (Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 137-138 (2014), the Supreme Court rejected general jurisdiction over the German carmaker Daimler in California’s state court. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 8:14 pm
” After British Airways refused to pay Click 2 Refund’s demand based on its customers’ EU 261 claim, the company filed a lawsuit, naming itself as the sole plaintiff, in a California state court. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:26 am
Affirming a state appellate court’s decision overturning the trial court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings to the trucking company, the state high court left it to the trial court to determine whether the company in fact misclassified its drivers (People ex rel Harris v Pan Anchor Transportation, Inc, July 28, 2014, Chin, M). [read post]
28 May 2020, 4:51 pm
While the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has yet to weigh in on the FMCSA’s December 2018 Preemptive Determination with respect to California’s meal and rest period requirements under the Labor Code and Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order 9, thus far district courts in California have upheld the FMCSA’s decision. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
From Monday's decision in Hicks v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:22 am
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
Court of Appeal for the 10th Circuit in Kenney v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:23 am
Details of AB5 The law requires that workers in California be considered an employee unless employers can show that the work they perform meets the rigorous criteria as designated in last year’s California Supreme Court ruling in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm
But in the wake of the court’s June decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
