Search for: "CAMPBELL, Corrections Officer"
Results 201 - 220
of 259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2016, 11:46 am
Campbell, 90 Ohio St.3d 320 (2000) (the failure to advise a defendant of the right of allocution is reversible error that requires resentencing.) [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Campbell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
Germany ZDNet had a piece entitled “Microsoft Office 365: Banned in German schools over privacy fears”. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
United States raises a “colorable question” as to the correctness of the Fifth Circuit's decision it reversed or provides no “basis to conclude that” it “created an intervening change or ‘correction’ in the applicable law”; and 2) whether an appeal from the denial of double jeopardy relief following a judgment of acquittal may be not “colorable” so as to destroy appellate jurisdiction, or whether appellate… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Kimberley Fletcher on the occasion of the publication of her book “The Collision of Political and Legal Time: Foreign Affairs and the Supreme Court’s Transformation of Executive Authority” (Temple University Press, 2018, 296 pp., cloth: $99.50, paper: $39.95). [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:13 am
Box 110620 Juneau, AK 99811-0620 Phone: (907) 465-3370 TTY: (907) 465-2225 Fax: (907) 465-2677 Web: http://www.hss.state.ak.us The Arc of Anchorage 2211 Arca Drive Anchorage, AK 99508 Phone: (907) 277-6677 Web: http://www.arc-anchorage.org Multiple Sclerosis Alaska Division of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society 511 West 41st Avenue, Suite 101 Anchorage, AK 99503 Phone: (907) 563-1115 Email: aka@nmss.org Web: http://www.nationalmssociety.org/aka Speech and Language Alaska… [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Applying this analysis, the Judge’s rulings on qualified privilege were correct. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Campbell (2003), and properly allowed the jury to consider nonparty harm only in assessing reprehensibility. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
On the same day there is the adjourned application in Campbell v Telegraph Media Group Next week in Parliament Tuesday 29 January 2013, 8.55am & 2pm, Crime and Courts Bill [HL] Committee. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:01 pm
Lawmakers failed to pass a routine “errors and inconsistencies” bill to correct unintended budget language that prevents the ethics panel from disbursing additional money to clean elections candidates starting on July 1. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:01 pm
Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business ISBN or UPC: 0-7355-6324-1(Active Record) Format: Cloth Text Date: Apr 2007 Price $126.00 Availability: Readily Available LC Class #: KF9618.M52 2007 Dewey #: 347.73/9 ISBN 13: 978-0-7355-6324-7 Principled Discretion: Developing a Coherent Sentencing Policy Author: O'Malley, Tom Publisher: Irish Academic Press ISBN or UPC: 0-7165-2931-9(Active Record) Format: Trade Cloth Date: Nov 2007 Price… [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Campbell, 541 U.S. 637 (2004)...................2Oken v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 6:37 am
(Private entity providing day-to-day management services to a correctional facility subject to audit by state. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm
This post is co-authored by Campbell University law professor Gregory Wallace. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
Misuse of private information was recognised as a cause of action in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 and is now firmly established in English law. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
Campbell Road, Suite 312Richardson TX 75080Phone 214-383-9088Fax 214-383-5890 Email… [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
Scotland In the case of Campbell v Dugdale [2019] ScotSC 32 the Sheriff’s Court dismissed a libel action against MSP Kezia Dugdale over an allegation that blogger Stuart Campbell had posted “homophobic tweets”. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 12:44 pm
And last month, Kurt Campbell, the National Security Council coordinator for Indo-Pacific affairs, announced that the era of “engagement” with China had “come to an end,” and that the “dominant paradigm” between the United States and China is now one of competition. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
As Jud Campbell has explained, antebellum Americans recognized “a common set of rights, applicable against the state and federal governments alike,” but they thought those rights were “regulable” by a state’s police power; therefore, this recognition of a common set of rights “did not necessarily mean that those rights had the same legal boundaries. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
I have reproduced almost the entirety of Wikipedia's entry on the fair use doctrine in italics below, you can find the original here. [read post]
