Search for: "CHANG V. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION" Results 201 - 220 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am by Rosalind English
Our selfish interests In law, as in other social sciences, we do well to remind ourselves that our cooperative tendencies, such as they exist, do not derive from some drive to produce objective justice. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:12 pm by Dianne Saxe
Transformational changes are essential to improve how government operates in this area. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
As noted below, the Administrative Court will hear the appeal in the case of R (Chambers) v DPP on Wednesday. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-5155 September 8, 2011 Judge: Briscoe Areas of Law: Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Petitioner Becky Jean Willig appealed an opinion and order entered by a United States Magistrate Judge that affirmed the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) denying her application for supplemental security income benefits. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 19, 2011Briscoe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:29 am by John Tucker
In one of his "Commissioner's Broadcasts," Commissioner of Social Security, Michael Astrue announced on July 22, 2011 that the Social Security Administration will begin closing offices early due to its strained budget and loss of staff. [read post]
Furthermore, Social Security's medical-vocational guidelines (which were found to be constitutional in Heckler v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by The Legal Blog
While those concerns are as real today as they were when the provision was enacted, nevertheless subsequent changes in womens status, the rights enjoyed by them, scientific developments and advancements, and changes in legal provisions which recognize a childs right to know its biological antecedents, cannot be ignored. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:00 am by Rosalind English
The change in the identity of adjudicator of the social security benefits awards in 1998, which was not accompanied by any change in the statutory criteria for recovery of overpayments, was not intended to open the door to recovery any wider than it previously had been. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:23 pm by Robert McKennon
“Instead,” DeBofsky said, “courts conduct reviews of claim records assembled and shaped by self-serving insurance companies without hearing any testimony whatsoever, under a procedure that gives more deference to the insurance company than a court would give a Social Security administrative law judge in its review of a Social Security disability benefit claim denial. [read post]