Search for: "COOPER v. THE STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 8,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2007, 6:40 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:37 am
Cooperation will include identifying relevant witnesses, disclosing their accounts and the documents shown to them. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:27 am
Supreme Court case of Davis v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:55 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued a ruling interpreting the obligations of the United States to cooperate with a Russian request for discovery in connection with a criminal case in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 7:14 am
Cooper and Missouri v.... [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:22 am
In 1977, the United States Supreme Court decided Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:38 pm
This is a nice illustration of the fact that in at least some circumstances, the United States simply must use civilian criminal courts if it wants to have its hands on a terrorism-related suspect–not to mention the fact that this approach in at least some cases can provide relatively swift and certain just, and quite possibly a lot of cooperation as well. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:48 am
Weber and State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:25 pm
Cooper. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 10:00 am
The facts underlying Allen v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
” Trans-Sterling, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 5:40 pm
CRS report – State Challenges to Federal Enforcement of Immigration Law: Historical Precedents and Pending Litigation in Texas v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:02 am
Wilson v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:58 am
The case is Michtavi v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 5:23 am
US v,. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 11:38 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals published an opinion on August 16, 2010 regarding the case of United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]