Search for: "CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, Section (C)" Results 201 - 220 of 2,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2022, 5:57 am by Kristy Parker
All but one of the judges for the District Court of the District of Columbia to consider the issues have so held. [read post]
17 May 2022, 8:30 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The court of appeals nevertheless affirmed the injunction, endorsing the district court’s reading of Section 1225 and holding that the Secretary’s new decision could not be considered because it had no legal effect. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:40 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 1512(c)(2) makes it criminal to, among other things, corruptly influence an "official proceeding. [read post]
9 May 2022, 2:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
(c) No person in the United States shall be criminally punished for aiding, encouraging, or making an agreement with another person related to conduct protected by (a) or (b). [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Tim Kelly said the committee had demonstrated its need for the party’s data on its fundraising emails between November 3, 2020, and January 6, 2021, when the RNC and Trump campaign sent supporters messages falsely suggesting the election was stolen. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court says websites’ “publicly available sections lack limitations on access,” which implies that any effort that don’t create technical barriers to access (such as robots.txt and C&D letters) are irrelevant. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:54 am by Eric Goldman
On remand, the district court rejects all of the constitutional challenges to FOSTA. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
The district court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim, concluding that while FNHRA may establish federal standards of care, it does not provide a private right of action that may be enforced under Section 1983. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 8:19 am by Andrew Hamm
The district court dismissed Gonzalez’s claim on the ground that Section 230 nonetheless protected Google for its recommendations because ISIS produced the videos, not Google. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 10:58 am by Brad Schnure
However, the memorandum fails to mention that marijuana users are federally prohibited from purchasing or possessing firearms, an omission that may put officers unknowingly at risk of criminal prosecution, or that the legitimacy of DRE evidence is currently being questioned by the New Jersey Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 7:09 am by John Elwood
United States, the Supreme Court held that the “residual clause” of the Armed Career Criminal Act (which is phrased similarly to the “residual clause” of Section 924(c)) was unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
Similarly, the District Court had rejected the agencies’ arguments regarding the TRIG questions. [read post]
Two doctors joined two parents on behalf of their minor children to file a complaint Tuesday in federal court against the governor and the district attorneys of Alabama, Shelby County, and Jefferson County, to block Alabama’s Vulnerable Child Compassion and Protection Act (“VCCPA”) from going into effect on May 8, 2022. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:02 pm by Shea Denning
So, a person who is cited by an officer for violating G.S. 20-158(b)(2)(a) will be summoned to criminal district court. [read post]