Search for: "California v. Tran"
Results 201 - 220
of 284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2012, 1:30 am
RT @tips4tech: #FF #tech @mklubok @wireheadlance @anthonymfreed @EUdiscovery @PrivacyProf @shawnetuma @shaundakin @intel_chris… # Amendments to California, Illinois Data Breach Laws Now in Effect http://t.co/1Q7Xo2IF # "Breaking News: Lexis Sells Applied Discovery" http://t.co/VpoYeAXp (via @ComplexD, @EDDUpdate & @LawTechNews) # Privacy Group Wants Gov Probe Into Facebook Timeline – A privacy group thinks that Facebook's Timeline feature may… [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 12:34 pm
., Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:21 pm
Trans. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
” Privacy In a case with distinct echoes of the efforts of some British sportsmen to keep their private lives out of the media, Arenas v Shed Media (22 August 2011), a California District Court has refused a basketball star’s application to injunct Shed Media’s reality TV show ‘Basketball Wives’. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:53 pm
Trans. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:19 am
The first is Glover v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 10:58 am
Penn Central Trans. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
Just as Loving v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:14 am
Do: $50,000 punitive damages award reversed for lack of meaningful financial condition evidence Tran v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, agreed that the unconscionably finding under California law was preempted by the FAA. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm
TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of STERNALVEST for sternal vests (TTABlog) District Court C D California: The Mongols have their colors back (for real): U.S. v Cavozos (Property, intangible) District Court S D New York: Numb Nuts, Part II: Olaes Enter., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Highlights this week included: Supreme Court affirms CAFC result but not ‘deliberate indifference’ standard: Global-Tech v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect:… [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:21 pm
Henderson v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:43 pm
Here we go again: this unpublished opinion from the California Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Five) reverses a punitive damages award because the plaintiff failed to introduce meaningful evidence of the defendant's financial condition. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
This is most explicit in Johnston v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:29 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:48 am
In Yumul v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
Walthers, Inc (Docket Report) (Gray on Claims) District Court C D California: Falsely advertising compliance with patented method constitutes false marking: King Tuna v. [read post]
