Search for: "California v. White"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,943
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
[The mentally ill defendant "testified and described how shooting white people was part of his divine, preordained mission to establish 'a kingdom of infinite peace and progress.'”] From People v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 3:03 pm
(California Court of Appeal, Feb. 9, 2023, Water for Citizens of Weed Cal. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:55 pm
(People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: In the 1987 decision, McCleskey v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 2:28 pm
Churchwell White LLP, Docket No. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
“To emphasize my point, I will tell a true story about Carlos, a young professional from Southern California who earned an MBA from a leading university. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm
" But in Pistacchio v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:15 am
The case, Langley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 12:32 am
In Howsam v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Mary Ziegler In his concurring opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 5:09 am
Ins. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Regents of the University of California (and later Grutter v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
In a recent decision involving claims that baby foods allegedly containing trace metals cause autism, a California trial judge shouted “not my job”[9]: “Under California law, the interpretation of epidemiological data — especially data reported in peer-reviewed, published articles — is generally a matter of professional judgment outside the trial court’s purview, including the interpretation of the strengths and weaknesses of a… [read post]
