Search for: "Callahan v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 250
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2009, 7:06 am
" United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:45 am
Brief of Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:34 am
Similarly, in Gill v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:45 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 11:34 am
That's no excuse at all; when the United States Attorney endows lawyers with the powers of federal prosecutors, he has a responsibility to properly train and supervise them so as to avoid trampling defendants' rights. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Franklin, MA; John Mcdonough, President) Bay State Network, Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:51 am
" Only in 24 pages.Plus we have the now-predictable pitches to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 2:30 am
The United States as amicus will be represented by David O’Neil, assistant to the U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 11:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:30 am
Callahan, No. 07-751 In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against state law enforcement officers who conducted a warrantless search of plaintiff's house incident to his arrest for the sale of methamphetamine to an undercover informant (whom plaintiff had voluntarily admitted to the premises), a court of appeals ruling reversing a ruling that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity is reversed where: 1) the procedure the Supreme Court mandated in Saucier v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:54 am
He focused on his recent occasion of arguing before the United States Supreme Court, an opporunity few Utah attorneys have had. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
Callahan (07-751) that the Saucier formula “should no longer be regarded as mandatory in all cases. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:30 am
United States, No. 08-5721. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:06 am
United States (08-5721), a sentencing guidelines case. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:52 am
The Circuit Court had summed up that view this way: “Precedent in this court and the Supreme Court holds that the Constitution does not confer rights on aliens without property or presence within the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:44 pm
The United States Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in Pearson v Callahan, Supreme Court No. 07-751, which could greatly expand the authority of the police to search an individual’s home. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
Callahan. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 10:21 am
Callahan, Docket No. 07-751; Arizona v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
United States and Arizona v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 8:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
