Search for: "Cameron v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
The '564 Patent '564 Patent - meet your nemesis Claim 1 of the '564 patent entitled "Insecticidal combination effective against fleas on mammals, particularly cats and dogs" claimed the following A composition which provides small mammals with long-lasting protection against fleas, which includes, on the one hand, [fipronil] and, on the other hand, at least one ovicidal compound (B), of insect growth regulator (IGR) type, in a fluid vehicle which is acceptable to the mammal and suitable… [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:49 am
Forty-one days after Gene's lecture, CAAF would issue its opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Benjamin Wittes
 European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Nor are developing countries likely to model their legal system on countries with first amendment protection, such as the United States, if the verdicts are 15 times higher than in the United Kingdom[6]. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
The United States has provided assurances that Julian Assange would not receive the death penalty in the event that he is extradited. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:20 am by Colin Murray
Many of the cases which outlined the requirements of impartial investigation (like the Jordan case cited above, but including McKerr v United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v  United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 and Shanaghan v United Kingdom, no. 37715/97) involved the UK directly (and particularly its security operations in Northern Ireland). [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm by Bill Marler
The potentially affected FreshKampo and HEB products are past shelf life and no longer available for purchase in the United States. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 6:41 am by Steve Hall
The subject at the center of it all, Cameron Todd Willingham, was not present. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A California patient privacy case has reached the state´s Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The US Department of Justice under the Trump administration secretly obtained the phone and email records of a CNN reporter who covers the Pentagon, the network reported. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
Al- Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54 - Supreme Court clarifies meaning of “guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations” for the purpose of refusing refugee status, two applicants lose appeal. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States Wired suggests that the state of Utah has become a leader in digital privacy with the passing of a new privacy law. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
United States On 11 April 2024, the Colorado Court of Appeals found that Section 230 immunity applied to two retweets from Donald Trump and his son about a Dominion Voting employee that said he was going to make sure Trump would not win the 2020 election, Coomer v Donald J. [read post]