Search for: "Caps v. Board Members" Results 201 - 220 of 349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2015, 6:10 am by Joy Waltemath
While the policy prohibited employees from wearing black clothing and “caps,” it did not explain the meaning of the term “cap. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Crafted largely in secret by a handful of Trump administration officials and members of Congress, the bill was rushed through the legislative process. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 7:37 am by Steve Lubet
As Justice Kavanaugh explained in his powerful concurring opinion in NCAA v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
We have seen securities suits filed against mid-cap, small-cap, and even micro-cap companies, particularly in fields such as life sciences, biotech and pharma. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm by James Hamilton
But, emerging growth companies would still comply with all stock exchange corporate governance and listing requirements, including board member independence rules. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
In response to unrelated litigation, SCDC also said it would cap solitary confinement at 60 days. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IPKat) Roya Ghafele's report 'Perceptions of Intellectual Property: A Review' highlights pressures facing the IP brand; new group gets ready to act (IAM) Progress in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee seen in informal sessions (Intellectual Property Watch) WIPO Committee on Traditional Knowledge and Folklore running in place (Intellectual Property Watch) WIPO Director General calls for concrete outcomes to benefit indigenous and local communities (WIPO) (Intellectual Property… [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:18 am by Zack Bluestone
Over the weekend, a Vietnamese fishing crew alleged that members of a Chinese vessel boarded their ship and subsequently destroyed fishing nets, food, and fuel. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm by Quinta Jurecic
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Paul alerted us to the Supreme Court’s pending decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]