Search for: "Castle v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 7:22 pm
Fortunately, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Shelley v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
The Court deemed premature, and declined to answer, a second question on which it had granted certiorari: whether the Court’s 1954 decision in Castle v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:57 pm
In recent years, appellate decisions in Castle Tex. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 6:52 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 5:01 am
Sample v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 8:00 am
Sample v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:50 am
White Castle. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 3:35 am
Subsequently the parties disagreed for a period of time over whether the meals met the proper standards for kosher food.In Castle v. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 11:38 am
The IPKat is pleased to host the following analysis by Vincenzo Vinciguerra (Weblegal and Cattolica University) on the recent design decision of the General Court in Lego, T-515/19.Here's what Vincenzo writes:The Lego Case T-515/19: A building block castle built up on sandby Vincenzo VinciguerraIn Lego A/S v EUIPO (T-515/19), the General Court (“GC”) considered the scope of protection of a design, consisting of the representation of a building-block that is part of… [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 12:45 am
IDT Telecom, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
” United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:24 am
They might do as the James Castle Collection and Archive (which has the largest privately held collection of Castle’s works) is suing Say and his publisher for copyright infringement in Boise federal court, alleging that many of Say’s illustrations “are intended to evoke and imitate the artistic style of James Castle but some two dozen of the illustrations “are far more than a tribute” and are “similar if not virtually identical… [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:49 pm
” Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
Practice Tip: The United States Supreme Court addressed the elements required for trade dress to be protected in Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
The Advocate General upheld the General Court’s decision that the State of Bavaria’s EUTM “Neuschwanstein”, a German fairy tale castle and popular tourist attraction, is not descriptive of the goods and services covered by the mark and not therefore not invalid. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:11 pm
It was slow to embrace the ruling in Brown v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
The court of appeals distinguished State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:50 am
Riley v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:38 am
– er, State v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:49 am
Castle of Davis and Cannon, LLP, Sheridan, Wyoming. [read post]
